Quant Memo
Core

Liquidity Around Scheduled Macro Releases

How spreads widen and depth vanishes in the minutes surrounding a known economic release like nonfarm payrolls or a rate decision, and why liquidity providers pull back predictably before the number even prints.

Some liquidity droughts are unscheduled and unpredictable — a sudden headline, a flash crash. Others are entirely predictable, because the calendar tells you exactly when they'll happen. A rate decision, a jobs report, an inflation print: everyone in the market knows the release time down to the second. That predictability doesn't stop liquidity from drying up around the event — if anything, it makes the pullback more mechanical and more extreme, because every liquidity provider is bracing for the same known risk at the same known moment.

Why liquidity providers pull back before the number

A market maker quoting a two-sided market earns the spread by being roughly right about fair value between trades. Right before a scheduled release, that's temporarily impossible — the release itself could move fair value sharply in either direction, and nobody, including the market maker, knows which way in advance. Quoting a normal, tight spread into that uncertainty means offering a nearly free option to anyone with even a slightly faster read of the number: if you're quoted tight and the number surprises, informed flow will trade against your stale quote before you can react. The rational response is to widen the spread and shrink the size quoted in the minutes leading into the release, sometimes pulling quotes almost entirely for the seconds immediately before and after, then re-quoting once the number is out and the immediate one-sided rush of order flow has been absorbed.

Worked example

A liquid Treasury futures contract typically quotes a tick-wide spread with deep size resting on both sides. In the two minutes before a nonfarm payrolls release at 8:30am, market makers routinely widen the quoted spread to two or three ticks and cut displayed depth to a fraction of normal — some studies of Treasury markets around scheduled releases document depth falling to well under half its typical level in the minute before the print. In the 10-30 seconds immediately around the release itself, liquidity can all but vanish, with the market effectively "gapping" through the old quotes as the first wave of informed reaction hits before market makers have re-quoted. Within a few minutes after the print, once initial direction is clear, spreads and depth typically snap back close to normal — the pullback is sharp but short-lived, concentrated tightly around the known release time rather than persisting through the day.

8:30 release 8:25 8:40
Spread widens sharply in the minute or two before a known 8:30am release, spikes at the print itself, and normalizes again within minutes once the initial reaction is absorbed.

What this means in practice

Execution algorithms and trading desks routinely build known macro release times into their schedules directly, pausing or slowing participation in the minutes surrounding a release rather than trading through it blindly, since the cost of crossing the spread is temporarily and predictably elevated. For strategies that specifically want exposure to the release's information (a discretionary macro trade reacting to the number), the widened liquidity is an accepted cost of trading on fresh information rather than something to avoid. The release calendar itself — nonfarm payrolls, FOMC decisions, CPI, and similar — is public and well known, which is exactly why this liquidity pattern is one of the most reliably schedulable frictions in the entire market.

Liquidity providers widen spreads and cut depth predictably in the minutes around a known scheduled macro release, because quoting normally into pre-release uncertainty offers a free option to faster-informed traders. The effect is sharp but short, concentrated tightly around the known release time.

Related concepts

Practice in interviews

Further reading

  • Fleming, Remolona, Price Formation and Liquidity in the U.S. Treasury Market, Journal of Finance (1999)
ShareTwitterLinkedIn