Earnings per Share and Dilution
EPS divides profit by share count, but the share count itself is a moving target once you account for options, convertible bonds and other claims that could turn into new shares.
Prerequisites: Reading an Income Statement
Two companies earn identical $100m of net income this year. One has 50 million shares outstanding, the other has 200 million. The first earns $2.00 for every share; the second earns $0.50. Same company profitability, wildly different per-share value, purely because of how the ownership pie is sliced. Earnings per share (EPS) exists to make profit comparable per unit of ownership, which is the number that actually maps onto a share price.
Preferred dividends are subtracted first because that income belongs to preferred holders, not common shareholders. The share count is weighted average because share counts change mid-year — a buyback or a new issuance partway through the year should only count for the fraction of the year it was actually outstanding.
Where dilution comes in
Basic EPS uses only shares currently outstanding. Diluted EPS asks a harder, forward-looking question: what if every option, warrant, restricted stock unit and convertible bond that could become common stock actually did? Employee stock options, executive compensation packages and convertible debt all represent claims that can turn into new shares, and every new share created dilutes the ownership — and the earnings — that existing shareholders lay claim to.
In words: if a convertible bond converts, the company no longer pays interest on it, so that saved interest is added back to the numerator, while the new shares that bond would create are added to the denominator. The result is always lower than or equal to basic EPS — dilution can only shrink the per-share pie, never grow it.
A worked example
A company reports net income of $80m and has 40 million basic shares outstanding, giving , i.e. $2.00. It also has employee stock options exercisable at prices well below the current share price, which under the treasury-stock method translate into a net 3 million additional shares, plus a convertible bond that would add 2 million shares and, if converted, would eliminate $1m of after-tax interest expense the company currently pays on it.
That works out to $1.80, 10% lower than basic EPS of $2.00 — the gap purely reflects claims on future shares that haven't been exercised yet but realistically will be, given they're profitable to exercise at current prices.
Basic EPS tells you profit per share that exists today. Diluted EPS tells you profit per share once every reasonably likely future claim on the company's equity is accounted for. Analysts and the company itself both report diluted EPS as the more conservative, decision-relevant number.
The classic mix-up is treating a growing basic-EPS number as proof shareholders are getting richer per share, without checking whether the gap between basic and diluted EPS is widening. A company that compensates heavily with stock options can grow basic EPS while quietly building up a large overhang of future dilution that will compress per-share earnings once those options are exercised.
Related concepts
Practice in interviews
Further reading
- Penman, Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation (Ch. on EPS)
- White, Sondhi & Fried, The Analysis and Use of Financial Statements (Ch. on EPS)