Qm

Spurious correlation: two drifting stock prices

Two stocks in unrelated businesses both drifted upward over a decade. Their daily price levels correlate at r=0.98r = 0.98. A colleague says such tightly correlated names must be a great pair trade.

Why is the 0.98 misleading, and what should you correlate instead?

Your answer

Solving needs a free account

Answers, streaks and solutions unlock when you are signed in. Reading the question and the hint stays free.

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion · reading is open to everyone

💡 Discussion rules

  1. No full solutions here. Hints and approaches only.
  2. Complexity, edge cases and intuition are the point.
  3. Interview experiences are welcome. Respect your NDAs.

Loading discussion…

Learn the concepts

The theory behind this question.

Related questions

Spurious correlation: quant-fund count and an altcoin's priceSpurious correlation: tea imports and life expectancySpurious correlation: cumulative ad spend and cumulative revenueSpurious correlation: strategy equity curve and the index levelWhy you run an A/B test for whole weeks, not "until it's ready"
All questions →