The Durbin-Watson clue in a spurious regression
You regress two independent random walks in levels. The residuals from this regression are themselves nearly a random walk, so their consecutive values are almost perfectly positively correlated.
Roughly what value does the Durbin-Watson statistic approach, and what does that tell you?
Your answer
Solving needs a free account
Answers, streaks and solutions unlock when you are signed in. Reading the question and the hint stays free.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion · reading is open to everyone
💡 Discussion rules
- No full solutions here. Hints and approaches only.
- Complexity, edge cases and intuition are the point.
- Interview experiences are welcome. Respect your NDAs.
Loading discussion…
Learn the concepts
The theory behind this question.
Related questions
Two random walks with R² of 0.9 and no relationshipWhy two random walks give a spurious regressionFixing a spurious regression by differencingWhen a levels regression of I(1) series is not spuriousNonsense correlation between two trending series
All questions →