Why two random walks give a spurious regression
You generate two completely independent random walks, and , with unrelated shocks, and regress on in levels. Even though nothing connects them, you routinely get a large and a -statistic on the slope that looks wildly significant.
Explain why this happens, and describe the diagnostics and remedy.
Your answer
Solving needs a free account
Answers, streaks and solutions unlock when you are signed in. Reading the question and the hint stays free.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion · reading is open to everyone
💡 Discussion rules
- No full solutions here. Hints and approaches only.
- Complexity, edge cases and intuition are the point.
- Interview experiences are welcome. Respect your NDAs.
Loading discussion…
Learn the concepts
The theory behind this question.
Related questions
Two random walks with R² of 0.9 and no relationshipVariance growth in a random walkThe Durbin-Watson clue in a spurious regressionFixing a spurious regression by differencingWhen a levels regression of I(1) series is not spurious
All questions →