Qm

People join the program right after a bad year

An analyst evaluates a job-training program with difference-in-differences, comparing trainees' earnings change to a control group of non-trainees. The estimate is strongly positive. But you notice that people tend to enroll right after a year in which their earnings dropped sharply.

Explain why enrolling after a bad year can create a fake positive effect, and how it breaks parallel trends.

Your answer

Solving needs a free account

Answers, streaks and solutions unlock when you are signed in. Reading the question and the hint stays free.

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion · reading is open to everyone

💡 Discussion rules

  1. No full solutions here. Hints and approaches only.
  2. Complexity, edge cases and intuition are the point.
  3. Interview experiences are welcome. Respect your NDAs.

Loading discussion…

Learn the concepts

The theory behind this question.

Related questions

The hidden assumption that makes diff-in-diff workA new subway opened the same year as the fare changeThe treated store was in a fast-growing suburbNew users versus veterans is not a fair diff-in-diffEstablishing causation: minimum wage and employment
All questions →