People join the program right after a bad year
An analyst evaluates a job-training program with difference-in-differences, comparing trainees' earnings change to a control group of non-trainees. The estimate is strongly positive. But you notice that people tend to enroll right after a year in which their earnings dropped sharply.
Explain why enrolling after a bad year can create a fake positive effect, and how it breaks parallel trends.
Your answer
Solving needs a free account
Answers, streaks and solutions unlock when you are signed in. Reading the question and the hint stays free.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion · reading is open to everyone
💡 Discussion rules
- No full solutions here. Hints and approaches only.
- Complexity, edge cases and intuition are the point.
- Interview experiences are welcome. Respect your NDAs.
Loading discussion…
Learn the concepts
The theory behind this question.
Related questions
The hidden assumption that makes diff-in-diff workA new subway opened the same year as the fare changeThe treated store was in a fast-growing suburbNew users versus veterans is not a fair diff-in-diffEstablishing causation: minimum wage and employment
All questions →