The Deliverable vs Non-Deliverable Pricing Wedge
When a currency can't be freely delivered offshore, its onshore forward and its offshore non-deliverable forward stop being the same trade priced twice — they can diverge for months at a time.
Prerequisites: FX Forwards and Forward Points, Covered Interest Parity
A forward contract on the Indian rupee should be a simple bet on where the rupee will trade in three months. But India restricts who can actually move rupees offshore, so a foreign hedge fund in London cannot just walk into a bank and take delivery of rupees the way it could with euros. The market's answer was to invent a version of the forward that never delivers the currency at all — and that workaround now trades at its own price, not always the same price as the "real" onshore forward.
A non-deliverable forward (NDF) settles the profit or loss in a hard currency like the dollar, never the restricted currency itself. Because it lives in a separate, offshore market with its own supply and demand, its implied exchange rate can drift away from the onshore deliverable forward — a gap called the deliverable/non-deliverable wedge.
Two forwards, two markets
A deliverable forward, the kind used for the euro or the yen, ends with an actual exchange of currencies at the agreed rate. An NDF on the rupee, the Chinese yuan (traded offshore as CNH), the Korean won, or the Brazilian real instead fixes a settlement rate against a public benchmark on the maturity date, and only the difference in dollars changes hands. Nobody ever touches actual rupees.
That structural difference matters because it means the NDF market is not forced to clear against the onshore market. Onshore rupee forwards are priced mostly by domestic banks and corporates operating under capital controls and central-bank oversight. The offshore NDF market is priced by international banks and funds who cannot access onshore rupee funding freely. When the two pools of participants have different funding costs, different views, or different access to hedging, the two forward rates can simply disagree.
Worked example
Suppose the onshore 3-month USDINR forward trades at 83.40, implied by local interest-rate differentials. On the same day, the offshore 3-month NDF is quoted at 83.65. A trader who could freely arbitrage would sell dollars forward onshore at 83.40 and buy them back offshore at 83.65, pocketing 0.25 rupees per dollar risk-free. In practice, that trade requires moving rupees across a border that regulation does not allow at will, so the 0.25 wedge can persist for weeks, widening further whenever offshore demand to hedge or speculate against the rupee spikes — for instance around an election or a sudden capital outflow, when foreign investors rush to hedge exposure through the only channel open to them, the NDF.
What this means in practice
The wedge is a live readout of how tight capital controls are biting at that moment, and desks watch it as a stress indicator: a widening NDF-onshore gap usually means offshore participants are paying up to hedge because they cannot access onshore liquidity, often a leading signal of currency pressure before it shows up in the spot rate itself.
Do not treat the wedge as free money waiting to be arbitraged. It exists precisely because the arbitrage that would close it — moving the underlying currency across the border — is restricted or banned. A wide wedge is a symptom of that restriction, not an error the market forgot to correct.
Related concepts
Practice in interviews
Further reading
- BIS Quarterly Review, 'Non-deliverable Forwards: Impact of Currency Internationalisation'