Qm

Data's weight against a Normal prior's pretend readings

You estimate a true value with a Normal prior whose precision equals that of 4 pretend readings (each reading having the same noise as your real measurements). You then take 6 real readings. The posterior mean is a weighted average of the prior mean and the sample average.

What fraction of the posterior-mean estimate is contributed by the real readings (rather than the prior)?

Your answer

Solving needs a free account

Answers, streaks and solutions unlock when you are signed in. Reading the question and the hint stays free.

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion · reading is open to everyone

💡 Discussion rules

  1. No full solutions here. Hints and approaches only.
  2. Complexity, edge cases and intuition are the point.
  3. Interview experiences are welcome. Respect your NDAs.

Loading discussion…

Learn the concepts

The theory behind this question.

Related questions

A strong prior versus forty flipsBayesian fair price with a Normal priorBayesian test-ability estimate with a Normal priorBayesian weight estimate from repeated readingsBayesian daily-return estimate with a Normal prior
All questions →