Qm

Five looks, but with a stricter 1% overall budget

A high-stakes experiment (a change that would be expensive to get wrong) will be checked at five evenly spaced interim points. Because the cost of a false positive is high, you want the overall false-positive rate across all five looks to be only 1%, not the usual 5%.

Using a simple Bonferroni split, what threshold should each look require?

Your answer

Solving needs a free account

Answers, streaks and solutions unlock when you are signed in. Reading the question and the hint stays free.

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion · reading is open to everyone

💡 Discussion rules

  1. No full solutions here. Hints and approaches only.
  2. Complexity, edge cases and intuition are the point.
  3. Interview experiences are welcome. Respect your NDAs.

Loading discussion…

Learn the concepts

The theory behind this question.

Related questions

Splitting your alpha across five interim looksA per-look threshold for four interim analysesTen weekly peeks and the price of each oneOne midpoint check plus a final lookOne guardrail metric out of twenty went red
All questions →