Collider bias: founder pedigree and idea quality among funded startups
A VC observes that among the startups her firm has funded, founder pedigree and idea quality are negatively correlated: the stellar founders tend to have so-so ideas, and the standout ideas come from less-credentialed founders. Across the full population of startups that pitch, the two are unrelated. She wonders if great founders are lazy about ideas.
Explain why the funding decision induces this negative correlation, and why her worry is misplaced.
Your answer
Solving needs a free account
Answers, streaks and solutions unlock when you are signed in. Reading the question and the hint stays free.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion · reading is open to everyone
💡 Discussion rules
- No full solutions here. Hints and approaches only.
- Complexity, edge cases and intuition are the point.
- Interview experiences are welcome. Respect your NDAs.
Loading discussion…
Learn the concepts
The theory behind this question.
Related questions
Collider bias: why momentum and value fight inside your screenCollider bias: interview and test scores among new hiresCollider bias: SAT and GPA among admitted studentsCollider bias: food and location among surviving restaurantsThe best of fifty backtests looks amazing
All questions →