Topic · Systematic Strategies & Alpha
← All topicsPortfolio of Strategies
30 articles · 3 checkpoints · 20 deeper reads · 7 reference notes
Every article, in reading order
plant a flag as you finish eachRead these first
Giving two strategies the same dollar allocation is not the same as giving them the same risk, a low-volatility strategy needs more notional and often leverage to contribute as much risk as a high-volatility one, and platforms that confuse the two end up with portfolios dominated by whichever strategy happens to be the most volatile.
Rules that automatically cut a portfolio's risk after a loss, reduce gross exposure by half at a 5% drawdown, flatten entirely at 10%, trade away some of the recovery upside from staying invested through a dip, in exchange for capping how bad a bad month is allowed to get.
Firms like Millennium and Citadel run dozens to hundreds of independent trading teams (pods) on one balance sheet, each given a narrow risk budget and cut loose fast if it loses too much, trading the deep diversification of many small, uncorrelated books against the operational cost of constantly hiring, funding, and firing them.
Then the rest