Topic · Quant Research
← All topicsForecasting Methods
30 articles · 4 checkpoints · 20 deeper reads · 6 reference notes
A standalone topic: it is on no roadmap, so read it on its own terms.
Every article, in reading order
plant a flag as you finish eachRead these first
A model that says '+2% expected return' should, on average across every time it said that, be right around +2%. Checking whether it actually is, calibration, catches a whole class of quietly broken forecasts that a Sharpe ratio alone will not.
Your raw forecast is almost always too extreme. Pulling it partway toward zero, shrinkage, sounds like giving up on your own model, but it's usually the single biggest improvement you can make to a forecast's real-world accuracy.
Grinold's alpha formula is the bridge between a signal score and an expected return in real units: expected return equals the information coefficient, times volatility, times the standardised score. It is the single most-used formula in a research seat.
A model score tells you a stock ranks well. It does not, by itself, tell you how much return to expect, and the mapping from one to the other is a modelling choice with real consequences, not an afterthought.
Then the rest