Topic · Machine Learning & AI
← All topicsCausal ML
27 articles · 5 checkpoints · 17 deeper reads · 5 reference notes
Every article, in reading order
plant a flag as you finish eachRead these first
A confounder is a hidden variable that drives both a strategy's signal and its outcome, making a correlation look like a tradeable edge when it is really just two effects of the same underlying cause.
Estimating a treatment effect answers "did this help on average"; policy learning goes one step further and asks "who specifically should get it", a genuinely different, harder question.
Uplift modelling predicts how much a specific action changes an individual's behaviour, not just how likely they are to behave that way, the difference between targeting people who will respond and people who will respond because of you.
Double machine learning estimates the effect of one variable on an outcome while letting flexible ML models absorb every confounder, using a two-stage residual trick that keeps the final effect estimate from inheriting the ML models' own overfitting bias.
An average effect can hide the fact that a treatment helps some people and hurts others, CATE estimation uses machine learning to predict how the effect itself varies across individuals, not just its overall average.
Then the rest