Quant Memo
Core

Pre-1963 Tests of the Classic Factors

Most textbook factor research starts its data in 1963 because of a CRSP database cutoff, not because value and momentum didn't exist earlier — separate studies pushing back into the 1800s find the same premia, which matters for judging how likely they are to be overfit.

Prerequisites: The Factor Zoo and the Replication Crisis

Almost every well-known factor study — Fama-French, momentum papers, and most of what feeds into standard factor data libraries — starts its sample around 1926, or in the case of many with cleaner accounting data, 1963. That start date is not chosen because markets or the value and momentum effects began then; it is chosen because the standard US database (CRSP) begins coverage in 1926, and reliable book-value data for the value factor becomes usable only from around 1963 onward. A factor "confirmed" only on data starting in 1963 is really being tested on one continuous sample of roughly sixty years, which is a real constraint on how much confidence a single backtest deserves.

Researchers who care about this have pushed the tests back further using hand-collected or alternative datasets: studies using UK and US data back into the 1800s, and reconstructions of momentum and value effects using newspaper-archived prices from the early twentieth century, generally find the same premia persisting — momentum profits appear in US data back to the 1920s and in some UK reconstructions back further still, and value's outperformance shows up in samples predating the CRSP era. This out-of-sample evidence, entirely disjoint from the period most factor papers were built and tuned on, is one of the stronger pieces of evidence that factors like value and momentum are not statistical artifacts of a single overfit sample window.

The common 1963 start date in factor research is a database availability artifact, not evidence about when the effects began; independent tests on pre-1963 and pre-1926 data finding the same premia are meaningfully stronger evidence than another regression on the same familiar sample.

Related concepts

Further reading

  • Goetzmann & Jorion, various long-run US and global stock market studies
ShareTwitterLinkedIn