Quant Memo
Core

GICS and ICB Sector Classification

Two competing taxonomies, GICS and ICB, sort every public company into a sector hierarchy — the scheme behind sector ETFs, style analysis, and 'compare this stock to its peers.'

Every time you see "tech stocks fell today" or a "financials sector ETF," someone had to decide which companies count as tech and which count as financials. The two dominant systems for doing this are GICS (Global Industry Classification Standard, run jointly by MSCI and S&P) and ICB (Industry Classification Benchmark, run by FTSE Russell). Both assign every public company to a single place in a hierarchy, and both are used as the backbone for sector indices, sector ETFs, peer-group comparisons, and factor and style analysis.

GICS uses a four-level hierarchy: sector (11 of them, such as Information Technology, Health Care, Financials), industry group, industry, and sub-industry — each company gets one code that places it precisely at the most granular level, and that code rolls up cleanly to every broader level above it. ICB uses an analogous four-level structure with different labels (industry, supersector, sector, subsector) and its own sector boundaries, which don't map one-to-one onto GICS. A company classified as "Consumer Discretionary" under GICS might land in a differently-named ICB sector, because each provider draws the lines around what counts as a company's "primary business" slightly differently — usually based on where the majority of revenue comes from.

Worked example

A diversified technology company earns most of its revenue from consumer electronics hardware, with a smaller but growing services and subscription business.

LevelGICS classification
SectorInformation Technology
Industry GroupTechnology Hardware & Equipment
IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Sub-IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Sector Industry Group Industry Sub-Industry
Each level rolls up cleanly into the one above it — a company has exactly one path through the hierarchy.

Because the classification is driven by dominant revenue source rather than brand perception, a company many investors think of as a "services" or "platform" business can still be classified under Hardware if that's where the bulk of its revenue historically comes from — and a large revenue mix shift can eventually trigger a reclassification to a different sector entirely, which in turn moves the company out of one sector ETF's holdings and into another's.

GICS and ICB are two independent taxonomies with different sector boundaries — a company's "sector" is not a universal fact, it depends on which classification system, and which revenue-based rule, you're using.

Because sector ETFs and style indices are built directly on these classifications, a mid-year reclassification — triggered by a shift in a company's revenue mix — can cause it to be dropped from one sector fund and added to another, generating real buying and selling with no change in the company's actual business that week.

When comparing a stock's valuation multiple to "its sector average," always confirm which classification system and which level of the hierarchy the peer group was built from — a sub-industry peer set can look very different from a broad sector peer set for the same company.

Related concepts

Further reading

  • MSCI/S&P, Global Industry Classification Standard Methodology
ShareTwitterLinkedIn