Quant Memo
Foundational

Converting Fractions, Decimals and Percentages

The mental-math backbone of every quant interview: recognizing common fractions as decimals and percentages on sight, instead of dividing them out by hand under time pressure.

In an interview you'll often be handed a fraction mid-calculation — "that's 7 out of 16 trades" — and expected to say "about 44%" without reaching for a calculator or grinding out long division. The gap between candidates who freeze at that moment and candidates who answer instantly isn't raw calculation speed; it's that the fast ones have a small library of fraction-to-decimal conversions memorized cold, and know how to combine them for anything not directly in the library.

Build the library, don't derive it live

The core idea is to memorize a handful of "atomic" fractions and their decimal/percentage forms, then combine them by simple arithmetic instead of doing division from scratch every time. The atoms worth knowing:

  • Halves and quarters: 1/2=0.51/2 = 0.5, 1/4=0.251/4 = 0.25, 3/4=0.753/4 = 0.75.
  • Thirds: 1/3=0.331/3 = 0.3\overline{3}, 2/3=0.662/3 = 0.6\overline{6}.
  • Fifths: 1/5=0.21/5 = 0.2, 2/5=0.42/5 = 0.4, 3/5=0.63/5 = 0.6, 4/5=0.84/5 = 0.8.
  • Eighths: 1/8=0.1251/8 = 0.125, 3/8=0.3753/8 = 0.375, 5/8=0.6255/8 = 0.625, 7/8=0.8757/8 = 0.875.
  • Sixteenths: 1/16=0.06251/16 = 0.0625, each further sixteenth adds another 0.06250.0625.
  • Sevenths: 1/70.1428571/7 \approx 0.142857, repeating — worth knowing exists even if you don't memorize the digits.

In plain English: once you know 1/8=0.1251/8 = 0.125, you get 3/83/8 for free by tripling it, and you get 7/167/16 by noting it's close to 1/21/16=0.50.0625=0.43751/2 - 1/16 = 0.5 - 0.0625 = 0.4375 — you're composing known atoms, not dividing 7 by 16 longhand.

Worked example 1: 7/16 without long division

Recognize 16=4×416 = 4 \times 4, so 1/161/16 is a quarter of 1/4=0.251/4 = 0.25, giving 1/16=0.06251/16 = 0.0625. Then 7/16=7×0.06257/16 = 7 \times 0.0625. Break the multiplication up: 7×0.0625=7×0.06+7×0.0025=0.42+0.0175=0.43757 \times 0.0625 = 7 \times 0.06 + 7 \times 0.0025 = 0.42 + 0.0175 = 0.4375. So 7/16=43.75%7/16 = 43.75\% — reached in three small steps, none harder than single-digit arithmetic.

Worked example 2: 11/12 as a deviation from 1

For fractions close to 1, it's faster to compute the gap than the fraction itself. 11/12=11/1211/12 = 1 - 1/12. You know 1/12=14×13=0.25×0.333...0.08331/12 = \tfrac{1}{4} \times \tfrac{1}{3} = 0.25 \times 0.333... \approx 0.0833. So 11/1210.0833=0.916711/12 \approx 1 - 0.0833 = 0.9167, i.e. about 91.7%91.7\%. This "distance from a round number" trick is often faster than computing the fraction directly, especially for numerators close to their denominators.

Atoms to memorize: 1/2 = .50 1/4 = .25 3/4 = .75 1/3 = .333 2/3 = .667 1/8 = .125 1/16 = .0625 Combine by adding/doubling/subtracting from 1 — don't divide from scratch.
A small memorized set of fraction atoms, combined by simple arithmetic, covers almost every fraction that comes up in an interview.

What this means in practice

This skill isn't decorative — it's the substrate underneath every mental-math question that follows: computing a Sharpe ratio on the fly, sanity-checking a hedge ratio, converting a win rate into odds. If converting 5/85/8 to a percentage takes you visible effort, every downstream calculation in the interview slows down and compounds into looking unprepared. Five minutes a day drilling the atoms above pays for itself almost immediately.

Memorize a small set of fraction-to-decimal "atoms" (halves, quarters, thirds, fifths, eighths, sixteenths) and combine them by addition, doubling, or subtracting from 1 — never derive a common fraction from scratch by long division under time pressure.

For a fraction close to 0 or 1, compute the gap to the nearest round number instead of the fraction itself: 11/1211/12 is easier as 11/121 - 1/12 than as a direct division.

Related concepts

Practice in interviews

Further reading

  • Common quant interview prep guides (mental math drills)
ShareTwitterLinkedIn