Quant Memo
Foundational

Fiscal Policy and Government Deficits

How government spending and taxation decisions affect the economy and financial markets, and why the deficit they create has to be financed by issuing debt that markets then have to absorb.

Monetary policy is one lever a government economy has for steering itself; fiscal policy — spending and taxation, set by the legislature and executive rather than the central bank — is the other. When a government spends more than it collects in taxes in a given year, the shortfall is the budget deficit, and every dollar of it has to come from somewhere: the government borrows it, by issuing bonds, which markets then have to absorb.

Discretionary versus automatic

Fiscal policy shows up in two forms. Discretionary fiscal policy is a deliberate choice — a stimulus package, a tax cut, a new infrastructure program — that requires new legislation. Automatic stabilizers kick in without any new law at all: unemployment benefit payouts rise automatically in a downturn as more people lose jobs, and tax revenue falls automatically as incomes and profits shrink, both of which cushion the economy without anyone having to vote on it. Automatic stabilizers are why deficits reliably widen during recessions even if no policymaker does anything new — falling tax revenue and rising transfer payments happen mechanically.

Deficits, debt, and the bond market

A persistent deficit accumulates into the national debt, financed by government bond issuance. The size of the deficit relative to the size of the economy (debt-to-GDP) is the standard yardstick for judging whether a government's borrowing looks sustainable, because an economy that's growing can carry more debt in absolute terms without its burden increasing in relative terms. When markets start doubting a government's ability or willingness to manage its debt, they demand a higher yield to hold that government's bonds — the sovereign-debt equivalent of a credit spread widening.

A concrete example

During a recession, a government might see tax revenue fall by 3% of GDP purely from automatic stabilizers (lower incomes, higher unemployment claims) and then add a further 2% of GDP in discretionary stimulus spending, pushing the deficit from a pre-recession 2% of GDP to 7% of GDP in a single year. That larger deficit means a correspondingly larger volume of new government bonds hitting the market that year, which is one of the reasons government bond yields and issuance calendars get closely watched by rates desks during and after recessions.

What this means in practice

Fiscal deficits matter to markets in two separate ways: as a demand-side lever affecting growth and inflation (relevant to equities and inflation-linked assets), and as a supply-side fact about how many bonds the market will need to absorb (relevant to bond yields directly, independent of the economic cycle). A rates or macro trader watching a deficit forecast is really watching both of these at once — what it implies about future growth and inflation, and what it implies about future bond supply.

Fiscal policy — government spending and taxation — affects the economy both through deliberate discretionary choices and through automatic stabilizers that widen or narrow deficits mechanically with the business cycle. Every deficit dollar has to be financed by issuing government debt, which is why deficit size matters directly to bond markets, not just to the broader economy.

Related concepts

Further reading

  • Blanchard, Macroeconomics, ch. 22
ShareTwitterLinkedIn